Notice Labs
Comp AI

Publish now. Decide on a compliance platform separately.

Notice Labs gives your team direct ownership of one current public link, on your custom domain, ready to publish without operating infrastructure.

Start independently, or keep Comp AI for established compliance work while Notice Labs owns the customer-facing destination.

Vendor-authored comparison by Notice Labs; not affiliated with Comp AI. Last reviewed .

The short answer

For teams choosing who owns the public answer.

Publish directly now. Keep what still works behind it.

Choose Notice Labs for a ready-to-use, directly owned public home with immediate publishing, a custom domain, and no infrastructure operation.

If Comp AI already supports your compliance programme, keep those workflows and make Notice Labs the one current public link. The public page is the part your buyers actually read.

Notice Labs does not replace compliance operations, audits, evidence collection, certification, or independent assessment.

Choose the owner of the public layer.

Start with Notice Labs, choose Comp AI for connected compliance operations, or retain Comp AI while moving the public trust page to a destination your team owns directly.

Notice Labs

Own a fixed, opinionated trust page directly.

Best for teams ready to publish now on one current link and a custom domain, without a scoped platform purchase.

  • Publish immediately on a hosted service
  • Keep the customer-facing answer in your hands
  • Add NDA gates and analytics if you need them, on Enterprise
  • Choose fixed monthly or annual public pricing
Comp AI

The trust portal should sit inside compliance operations.

Best for teams that need evidence, frameworks, policies, cloud and device checks, audit work, questionnaires, and customer assurance together.

  • Automate recurring evidence
  • Manage frameworks and policies
  • Prepare and organise audit work
  • Govern access with NDAs and grants
Comp AI

Keep Comp AI and give the trust page a direct owner.

A practical option for existing Comp AI customers who are contract-bound or want to preserve their compliance workflows while moving the public destination to Notice Labs.

  • Retain established compliance operations
  • Publish one customer-facing source of truth
  • Move the public link on your own timeline
  • Reassess the broader platform at renewal

Notice Labs vs Comp AI

This compares the public trust page, purchasing path, and operating model. Comp AI extends into compliance workflows and controlled access; Notice Labs is ready to publish directly.

Primary job
Notice LabsPublic security publishing
Comp AICompliance automation and customer assurance
Direct publishing
Notice LabsReady to publish immediately after setup
Comp AITrust portal published from selected compliance-system content
Public destination
Notice LabsOne current link on a custom domain, owned directly by your team
Comp AITrust portal connected to the broader compliance platform
Public trust content
Notice LabsControls, documents, subprocessors, and vulnerability disclosure
Comp AISelected frameworks, controls, policies, vendors, FAQs, and links
Access governance
Notice LabsDocument requests; NDA gates and password protection on Enterprise
Comp AINDA signing, timed grants, revocation, watermarks, and audit logs
Compliance automation
Notice LabsKept outside the public publishing product
Comp AIEvidence, frameworks, policies, risk, cloud, devices, and audits
Operational footprint
Notice LabsHosted; no infrastructure operation required
Comp AIHosted, or self-hosted with infrastructure and maintenance owned by the operator
Product packaging
Notice LabsPro covers publishing; Enterprise adds NDA gates, domain gates, analytics and AI triage
Comp AIPlatform capabilities and services depend on quoted scope
Purchasing
Notice LabsFixed public pricing: Pro £39/month, Enterprise £349/month
Comp AINumeric price supplied after a scope call
Term optionality
Notice LabsPublished monthly and annual purchase options
Comp AIStandard terms specify a 12-month minimum commitment

Comparison reflects publicly available product and pricing pages reviewed . Features may vary by plan.

More governance for sensitive access

Comp AI Trust Access combines public assurance content with approvals, NDAs, gated files, time-limited grants, revocation, watermarks, and audit events. Those controls serve a more involved access workflow than Notice Labs' direct document-request model.

Maintain the customer-facing answer directly

Notice Labs is a ready-to-use, fixed trust page. Publish controls, documents, subprocessors, and a vulnerability contact immediately; keep one current link on your custom domain and update it directly.

Pro covers publishing; Enterprise adds NDA gates, domain gates, analytics and AI triage, all at fixed public monthly or annual pricing, with no infrastructure for your team to operate.

Open our trust center
trust.noticelabs.co
The Notice Labs trust center: an introduction, featured documents, security controls, subprocessors, compliance, a privacy request form and a vulnerability report form.

The operations around customer assurance.

Comp AI is built to operate a compliance programme. If you need that, it can sit behind a Notice Labs trust center. If what you need today is a page customers can review, you don't need to buy a programme first.

Connected compliance work

Recurring evidence, controls, frameworks, policies, risks, vendors, cloud checks, device checks, and audit workflows live in one platform.

Reviewable questionnaires

Internal teams and approved buyers can process questionnaires using published policies and other approved knowledge sources.

Fixed product pricing versus a scoped programme quote.

Notice Labs publishes monthly and annual prices before signup. Comp AI presents a quote after scoping frameworks, company size, timeline, audit and security needs, and included services.

Notice Labs

Fixed, opinionated trust page

£39a month

Public pricing

Pro is £39 a month or £425 a year for one trust center. Enterprise is £349 a month or £4,000 a year and adds unlimited trust centers, NDA gates, email-domain gates, trust center analytics and AI triage for vulnerability reports. Prices exclude tax.

Comp AI hosted

Compliance and trust platform

Customquote

Scope call

Current standard terms specify a minimum 12-month commitment and successive annual renewals with a notice requirement.

Questions worth asking.

Straight answers for teams comparing Notice Labs and Comp AI.

Is Notice Labs a Comp AI alternative?

Yes, when the buying decision is a ready-to-use, fixed trust page. Existing Comp AI customers can also use Notice Labs for the public layer while retaining their established compliance workflows.

Does Comp AI include a trust center?

Yes. Comp AI has a Trust Center for selected public assurance content, while Trust Access adds approval, NDA, gated-file, expiry, revocation, watermark, questionnaire, and audit capabilities.

Can Comp AI be self-hosted?

Yes. Comp AI publishes an AGPLv3 core and documents Docker deployment. Operators remain responsible for infrastructure, security, maintenance, and upgrades, and should confirm which enterprise capabilities and support arrangements apply.

Does Comp AI publish pricing?

Comp AI does not publish a numeric rate card. It says an exact price is presented during a scope call and depends on factors including frameworks, company size, timeline, audit and security needs, and included services. Notice Labs publishes fixed GBP prices, but that does not prove which option is cheaper for equivalent scope.

Can Notice Labs and Comp AI be used together?

Yes. This is especially practical for contract-bound Comp AI customers: retain the existing compliance workflows, make Notice Labs the single public destination, and revisit the broader platform when renewal options arise.

Methodology and sources

Last verified

We compared current Comp AI product, documentation, pricing, legal, repository, licence, self-hosting, and live Trust Center sources with Notice Labs' current product and pricing. This is vendor-authored, point-in-time research: we separated hosted and self-hosted claims, did not infer feature absence from missing documentation, and recommend verifying current packaging, pricing, terms, and contractual scope. Neither pricing model establishes overall comparative cost.

Publish a security page customers can understand.